Jeoloji Münendisliği Dergisi
Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi

Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi

2007 HAZİRAN Cilt 31 Sayı 1
COVER
View as PDF
COPYRİHT PAGE
View as PDF
CONTENTS
View as PDF
Geological, Petrographical and Technological Investigations of Erkilet Basalt, Kayseri, Central Anatolia
Sedat Temur Yeşim Temur Gürsel Kansun
View as PDF

ABSTRACT: The study is executed in a wide area of the around Kayseri. Basalts are prevalent in northwestand southeast of this area, and are produced in the surroundings of Erkilet. The aim of this study isthe determination of production as building stone, depending on its geological setting,mineralogical and petrological properties, geochemistry, and technological testes of the basalt.Erkilet Basalt is the unit which belong to Miocene-Quaternary aged volcanites in the area.Mineralogically Erkilet Basalt contains 40-42 % microlites of plagioclase, 20-25 % clinopyroxene,18-20 % olivine, 4-5 % phenocrystales of plagioclase, 3-5 % orthopyroxene, calcite less than 4 %,opague mineral less than 4 %, and these basalts which indicate holocrystalline and porphyritictextures have composition of pyroxene-basalt. Geochemically, these rocks conform thoelitic-alkalicomposition according to distribution of K O-SiO , basalt according to distribution of (K O+Na O)-SiO , sub-alkali basalt according to distribution of Zr/TiO -Nb/Y, intracontinental basalt accordingto distribution of (Zr/Y)-Zr, and composition of continental basalt of late-post orogenic beltindicating effects of continental crust. Density, unit weight, rate of water suction in point of weight, pressure resistance, pressure resistance after than frost, frost loss and pressure resistance of thisrock appropriate for using being both natural building stone and coating stone. Plate giving, cuttingof edge-corner, and varnish taking of this rock is at good degree. Average abrasion resistance of thatis very near to the limit value.

  • Basalt,

  • geochemistry,

  • building stone,

  • Erkilet,

  • Kayseri

  • Acme, 2007. http://www.acmelab.com

  • Atilla, C., Gençalioğlu Kuşçu, G., 2005. Cora Maarı`nın (Erciyes volkanik bölgesi) fiziksel volkanolojisi; Türkiye Jeoloji Bült., 48, 2, 43- 58

  • Ayrancı, B., 1970. Orta Anadolu`da Kayseri civarında Erciyes volkanik bölgesinin kantitatif incelemelere istinaden petrolojisi ve jeolojisi; Maden Tetkik ve Arama Derg., 74, 13-24

  • Ayrancı, B., 1972. Orta Anadolu Erciyes bölgesi hiyalobazaltı yüksek temperatür labradoritinin optik oryantasyonu; Maden Tetkik ve Arama Derg., 78, 21-29

  • Baş, H., Güner, Y., Emre, Ö., 1986. Erciyes Dağı volkanitlerinin özellikleri; Selçuk Üniv. Müh. Mim. Fak. Derg., 1, 29-44

  • Baykal, F. , Ta t a r, Y. , 1970. Erciyes volkanizmasının yaşı hakkında gözlemler; Türkiye Jeol. Kur. Bült., 13, 19-25

  • Ercan, T., 1987. Orta Anadolu`daki Senozoyik volkanizması; Maden Tetkik ve Arama Derg., 107, 119-140

  • Haskin, L. A., 1989. Rare earth elements in lunar materials; Chemistry and Mineralogiy of Rare Earth Elements (Ed. B. R. Lipin and G. A. McKay), Reviee in Mineralogy, Vol 21, The Mineralogical Society ofAmer., 227-257.

  • İMMİB, 2001. Türkiye doğal taş envanteri (Kuşçu ve diğ., 2003`den).

  • Ketin, İ., Erentöz, C., 1963. 1:500.000 jeoloji haritası Kayseri paftası; Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müd., 83 s

  • Koca, M. Y., Yavuz, B., Kıncal, C., 2001. Andezitlerin dış mekan kaplama taşı olarak kullanımında Bergama örneği; Türkiye 3. Mermer Semp.,Afyon, Bildiriler, 99-112

  • Koralay, T., Kadıoğlu, Y. K., 2003. İgnimbiritlerin taban ve tavan ilişkilerini belirleyen petrografik veriler: İncesu (Kayseri) ignimbiriti; Selçuk Üniv. Müh. Mim. Fak. Derg., 18, 1, 43-54

  • Korkanç, M., Tuğrul, A., 2003. Suitability of Quaternary basalts for congrete aggregates; Intern. Symp. Idustrial Minerals and Building Stones, Istanbul, Proceedings, 667-673

  • Kuşçu, M., Yıldız, A., Bağcı, M., 2003. Investigation of Ağın andesite as a building stone (İscehisar – Afyon, W-Turkey); Intern. Symp. Industrial Mineals and Building Stones, Istanbul, Proceedings, 243-252

  • Labanis, B., Lecolle, M., 1989. Le diagramme La/10-Y/15-Nb/8: un outil pour la discrimination des series volcaniques et la mise en evidence des processus de melange et/ou de contamination crustale; C.R. Acad. Sci. Ser. II, 309, 2023-2029

  • Le Bas, M. J., Le Maitre, R. W., Streckeisen, A., Zanettin, B., 1986.Achemical classification of volcanic rocks based on the total alkali – silica diagram; Journal of Petrology, 27, 745-750

  • McDonough, W. F., Sun S.-S., Ringwood A. E., Jagoutz E., Hofmann A.W., 1992. Potassium, rubidium, and cesium in the Earth and Moon and the evolution of the mantle of the Earth. Geochim. Cosmochim.Acta 56, 1001–1012.

  • MTA, 2002. 1:500.000 jeoloji haritası Kayseri paftası (Ed. M. Şenel); MadenTetkik veArama Genel Müdürlüğü.

  • MTA, 2007. http://www.mta.gov.tr

  • Önal, A., Eren, D., Önal, A. ve Depci, T., 2005. Orduzu (Malatya) Volkanitleri`nin mermer ve yapıtaşı olarak kullanılabilirliği; Geosound / Yerbilimleri, 46, 229-244

  • Pearce, J. A., Cann, J., 1973. Tectonic setting of basic volcanic rocks using trace element analyses. Earth Planetary Science Letters 19, 290-300

  • Pearce, J. A., Norry, M. J., 1979. Petrogenetic implications of Ti, Zr, Y and Nb variations in volcanic rocks. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 69, 33-47

  • Rojay, B., Yalınız, K. M., Altıner, D., 2001. Tectonic implications of some Cretaceous pillow basaltsfrom the North Anatolian ophiolitic melange (Central Anatolia– Turkey) to the evolution of Neotethys; Turkish J. Eart Sci., 10, 93-102

  • Saunders,A. D.,Tarney, J., 1979. The geochemistry of basalts from a back-arc spreading centre in the East Scodia Sea; Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta, 43, 4, 555-572

  • Şentürk, A., Gündüz, L., Sarıışık, A., 1995.Yapı ve kaplamataşı olarak kullanılan endüstriyel kayaçlara teknik bir bakış; Endüstriyel Hammaddeler Semp. (Ed: Köse ve Kızıl), İzmir, 331 – 339

  • Taylor, S. R. McLennan, S. M., 1995. The geochemical evolution of the continental crust Reviews in Geophysics 33: 241-265

  • Toprak V., Göncüoğlu, M. C., 1993. Tectonic control on the development of the Neogene – Quaternary Central Anatolian volcanic province,Turkey; Geological Journal, 28, 357- 369

  • TSE, 1977a. Doğal yapı taşları; Türk Standart. Enst.,TS 2513, 6 s

  • TSE, 1977b. Kaplama olarak kullanılan doğal taşlar; Türk Standart. Enst.,TS 1910, 7 s

  • TSE, 1983. Kireçtaşı (kalker) – yapı ve kaplama taşı olarak kullanımı; Türk Standart. Enst., TS 11137, 18 s

  • TSE, 1987. Tabii yapı taşları – muayene ve deney metodları; Türk Standart. Enst., TS 699, UDK 691.2, 30 s

  • TSE, 1989. Mohs sertlik cetveline göre sertlik tayini; Türk Standart. Enst.,TS 6809, 4 s

  • Uygun, A., 1976. Hırka (Kayseri) diyatomit yatağının jeokimyası ve oluşumu; Türkiye Jeol. Kur. Bült., 19, 2, 127-132

  • Weaver, B.L., Tarney, J. 1984. Empirical approach to estimating the composition of the continental crust.; Nature 310: 575-577

  • Wikipedia, 2007. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basalt_fiber

  • Wilson, M., 1989. Igneous petrogenesis; Unwin Hyman Press, London, 456 pp

  • Winchester, J. A., Floyd, P. A., 1977. Geochemical discrimination of different magma series and their differentiation products using immobile elements; Chemical Geology, 20, 325-343.

  • Yalçınlar, İ., 1950. Türkiye`nin yeni volkanik arazisinin bazı morfolojik hususiyetleri; Türkiye Coğrafya Derg., 18, 19, 18-119

  • Yener, L., 2000. Andezit üretimi ve kullanımı artıyor; Mermer ve Doğal Taş Sekt. Derg., 24, 118-120



  • Temur, S , Temur, Y , Kansun, G . (2007). Erkilet Bazaltı`nın Jeolojik, Petrografik veTeknolojik İncelemesi, Kayseri, OrtaAnadolu . Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi , 31 (1) , 1-7 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jmd/issue/52387/686305

  • Temur, S , Temur, Y , Kansun, G . Erkilet Bazaltı`nın Jeolojik, Petrografik veTeknolojik İncelemesi, Kayseri, OrtaAnadolu. Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi 31 (2007 ): 1-7

  • Geology and Coal Potential of Orta-Şabanözü (Çankırı) Region
    İlker Şengüler
    View as PDF

    ABSTRACT: The study area is located in the Orta-Şabanözü (Çankırı) region. Various rock units of Triassicto Quaternary crop out. Triassic unit in the area is Kösrelik formation, the Cretaceous unit is Eldivanophiolite. The Miocene rock units are Kurtsivrisi volcanics, Hançili formation, Karakoçaşformation, Hüyükköy formation, Eregez agglomerate and Aydos basalts. Pliocene rocks in the areaare represented by Orta formation and Büyükyakalı formation. Alluvium is formed in Quaternary.Of Tertiary units, Eregez agglomerate, Hançili formation and Orta formation contain coal.It is considered that formation of the basin is associated with northward subduction of NeoTethys ocean under both Sakarya continent and itself since the beginning of Late Cretaceous. Thereare various comments on the Neogene evolution of Çankırı basin resulting from variousobservations. In the area between Orta and Şabanözü (Çankırı) coalification is within Miocene andPliocene deposits. Although lignites of Pliocene Orta formation show a regular extent, they areoccured in a specified part of the basin. Lignite formations within Miocene deposits have no regularand continous extent. Lignite formations, generally observed within the unit differentiated as Eregezagglomerate in NW of the basin and within Hançili formation in SE of the basin, are notdifferantiated clearly owing to the interference of Miocene deposits.

  • Orta-Şabanözü (Çankırı

  • geology

  • coal (lignite)

  • Akyürek, B., Bilginer, E., Çatal, E., Dağer, Z., Soysal, Y., ve Sunu, O., 1980, EldivanŞabanözü (Çankırı), Hasayaz-Çandır (Kalecik-Ankara) dolayının jeolojisi: MTA derleme rap. No: 6741, (yayımlanmamış), Ankara.

  • Birgili, Ş.,Yoldaş, R. ve Ünalan, G., 1975, ÇankırıÇorum havzasının jeolojisi ve petrol olanakları: MTA derleme rap. No: 5621, (yayımlanmamış),Ankara.

  • Erdoğan, B., Akay, E. and Uğur, M.S., 1996, Geology of theYozgat region and evolution of the collisional Çankırı basin: International Geology Review, 38, 788-806.

  • Gökmen V., Memikoğlu O., Dağlı M., Öz O., ve Tuncalı E., 1993, Türkiye Linyit Envanteri: MTAYayını 356s., Ankara.

  • Görür, N., Tüysüz, O. and Şengör, A.M.C., 1998, Tectonic evolution of the Central Anatolia Basin: International Geology Review, 40, 831- 850.

  • Has, F., Sezer, C., ve Özgen, S., 1977, Çankırı-Orta linyit sahası fizibilite araştırması: MTA derleme rap. No: 6077, (yayımlanmamış), Ankara.

  • İçel, İ. 1993, Çankırı-Orta-Yeniyayla ve Aydoğan Yayla linyit sahalarının jeoloji ve rezerv raporu: MTA derleme rap. No: 9585, (yayımlanmamış),Ankara.

  • Karadenizli, L. , 1 9 9 9 , Çankırı-Çorum Havzasındaki Orta Eosen-Erken Miyosen Tortullarının Sedimantolojisi, Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi, 51-195,Ankara.

  • Karadenizli, L., Kazancı, N., 2000, Çankırı-Çorum Havzasındaki Paleoyükselti ve Alt Havzalar, Cumhuriyetimizin 75. Yıldönümü ve Madencilik KongresiMTA, 209-227.,Ankara.

  • Karadenizli, L., Seyitoğlu, G., Saraç, G., Kazancı, N., Şen, Ş., Hakyemez,Y. ve Savaşcı,D., 2003, Çankırı-Çorum Havzası Batı kenarının Erken- Orta Miyosen Paleocoğrafik Evrimi. MTA Dergisi 126, 69-86,Ankara.

  • Karadenizli, L., Saraç. G., Şen, Ş., Seyitoğlu, G.,Antonie, P. O., Kazancı, N., Varol, B., Alçiçek, C., Gül,A., Ertan, H., Esat, K., Özcan, F., savaşcı, D., Antonie, A., Filoreau, X., Hervet, S., Bouvrain, G., Bonis, L., ve Hakyemez, Y., 2004, Çankır

  • Kaymakçı, N., Özçelik, Y., White, S. H. and Van Dijk, P. M., 2001, Neogene tectonic development of the Çankırı basin (Central Anatolia, Türkiye): Türkiye Petrol Jeologları Derneği Bülteni, 13, 27-56,Ankara.

  • Koçyiğit, A., Türkmenoğlu, A., Beyhan, A., Kaymakçı, N. and Akyol, E., 1995, Post collisional tectonics of Eskişehir-AnkaraÇankırı segments of İzmir-Ankara-Erzincan Suture Zone: Ankara Orogenic Phase: Turkish Assocation of Petroleum Geologist Bulleti

  • Seyitoğlu, G., Kazancı, N., Karadenizli, L., Şen, Ş., Varol, B. and Karabıyıkoğlu, T., 2000, Rockfall avalance deposits associated with normal faulting in the NW of Çankırı basin: Implications for the postcollisional tectonic evolution of the Neo-Tet

  • Seyitoğlu, G., Kazancı, N., Karadenizli, L., Şen, Ş., Varol, B. and Saraç, G., 2004, Neogene tectono-sedimentary development of the western margin of the Çankırı basin, central Turkey: reply to the comment of Kaymakçı 2003: Terra Nova, 16, 163-165.

  • Siyako, F. 1987, Şabanözü-Çankırı-Çandır çevresinin jeolojisi ve kömür olanakları: MTA derleme rap. No: 8149, (yayımlanmamış), Ankara.

  • Şengör, A.M.C. and Yılmaz, Y., 1981, Tethyan evolution of Turkey: a plate tectonic approach: Tectonophysics, 75, 181-241.

  • Tekkaya, İ., Atalay, Z., Gürbüz, M., Ünay, E. ve Ermumcu, M., 1975, Çankırı-Kalecik bölgesi karasal Neojeni`nin biostratigrafi araştırması: T.J.K. Bül. c.18 s1Ankara.

  • Tuncalı, E., Çiftçi, B., Yavuz N., Toprak S., Köker A., Gencer Z., Ayçık H. ve Şahin N., 2002 Türkiye Tersiyer Kömürlerinin Kimyasal ve Teknolojik Özellikleri: MTA Yayını, 401s., Ankara.

  • Turgut,A.T. ve Altınay,A. 1981, Çankırı-Şabanözü ve Orta ilçeleri civarındaki linyitli sahaların jeoloji raporu: MTA derleme rap. No:7017, (yayımlanmamış),Ankara.

  • Türkecan, A.,Hepşen, N., Papak, İ., 1991, Seben- Gerede (BOLU), Güdül-Beypazarı (ANKARA) ve Çerkeş-Orta-Kurşunlu yörelerinin jeolojisi ve volkanik kayaçların petrolojisi. MTA derleme rap. No: 9193, (yayımlanmamış),Ankara.

  • Türkmenoğlu, A., Akıman, O., Aker, S. ve Tankut, A., 1991, Orta (Çankırı) Yöresi Kil Yataklarının Jeolojisi ve Oluşumu. MTA Dergisi 113, 127-132,Ankara.

  • Tüysüz, O. ve Dellaloğlu, A. A., 1992, Çankırı havzasının tektonik birlikleri ve jeolojik evrimi: Türkiye 9. Petrol Kongresi Jeoloji Bildirileri, Ankara, 333-349.Ankara.

  • Tüysüz, O., Dellaloğlu, A. A. and Terzioğlu, N., 1995,Amagmatic belt within the Neo-Tethyan suture zone and its role in the tectonic evolution of northern Turkey: Tectonophysics, 243, 173-191.



  • Şengüler, İ . (2007). Orta-Şabanözü Çankırı Yöresinin Jeolojisi ve Kömür Potansiyeli . Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi , 31 (1) , 15-24 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jmd/issue/52387/686306

  • Şengüler, İ . Orta-Şabanözü Çankırı Yöresinin Jeolojisi ve Kömür Potansiyeli. Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi 31 (2007 ): 15-24

  • Some Neotectonic and Paleosismological features of the Fethiye-Burdur Fault zone, SWAnatolia.
    Mustafa Bozcu Fuzuli Yağmurlu Murat Şentürk
    View as PDF

    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this investigation is to explain some neotectonic and paleoseismolojicalfeatures of Fethiye-Burdur Fault zone that is located in SW- Turkey between gulf of Fethiye andBurdur Lake. This zone, which is about 300 km. in length, is characterized as a combination of anumber of normal faults which has generally left lateral oblique-slip in feature. It is, also,charecterized as beeing the most active fault system in Southwest Anotolia. Burdur fault zone,normally, extends in NE-SW direction, but it was segmented in various lengths by several faultstilted in NW direction. Burdur and Tefenni segments, that are 60-70 km. in length, are considered asthe most active lines of these segments. It has been reported that two major earthquakes in 1914 and1971 took place on these segments with a magnitude of 7.1 and 6.2, respectively.Trench studies have been conducted on Yassıgüme and Burdur locations to investigatedeformations caused by the vertical displacements following the 1914 and 1971 earthquakes. TheBurdur fault in theYassıgüme location is characterized as a single line fault structure in the field. Itsvisible fault plane clearly reflects the left lateral oblique – slip moving and related sliding lines. As aresult of the trench study performed on this segment a vertical displacement of 70 cm. in length hasbeen identified as belong the 1971 earthquake.On the other hand, Burdur segment, which is one of the most important branch of Burdur faultzone, consists of four different stepwise oblique fault systems within the south of Burdur Lake whichextends in NE direction. These fault systems pass through the city center of Burdur and caused thestepwise topographical features. The unconsolidated sediments within the trench section consistsdominantly of cross-bedded sands, mudstones and present slope-debris deposits. Also, fault planeand kolluvial sediments with muddy dike structures were found as most important structuralconstituents in the trenches. These structures are thought to be developed as a result of 1914earthquake. Several faults located on the hills show vertical displacements of 90-250 cm. Thesefaults are seen in discordant with the colluvial developments. Thus, the youngest faults located in thetrenches and hills can be considered having the highest vertical displacements. Observations ofsome folds and local discontinuties can be considered as typical in this type of settings.Two recent earthquekes, which took place in 3 and 5 April, 2002 with a magnitude of 3,9 and4,0 respectively, can be considered significant since they highlight the exsistence of sismic activityon this segment. Futhermore, they help us to prove that this segment can be identified as obliquelyleft tilted normal fault

  • Fethiye-Burdur Fault Zone

  • Paleoseismology

  • Tertiary

  • Tectono-Stratigraphy

  • Altınlı, İ. E., 1944. Antalya bölgesinin stratigrafik etüdü: İ. Ü. F. F. Mecmuası, Seri: B-C, IX, 3, 227-238

  • Barka, A., Reilinger, R., Şaroğlu, F., and Sengör,A. M. C., 1995. The Isparta Angle: Its evolution and importance in the tectonics of the eastern Mediterranean region: Int. Earth Sci. Collog. Aegean Region: Proceedings, 3-17.

  • Blumenthal, M., 1963. Le systeme structural du Taurus sud-Anatolien. In Livre a memoire du Proffesseur P. Fallot.Memoire de la Societe Geologique de France 2: 611-662.

  • Brunn, J. H., Dumont, J.F., Graciansky, P. C., Gutnic, M., Juteau, T., Marcoux, J., Monod, O., Poisson, A., 1971.Outline of the geology of the western Taurides. In Geology and History of Turkey, Campbell As (ed). Petroleum Exploration Society of Liby

  • Demirtaş, R. ve Erkmen, C., 2000. Odak mekanizması çözümü, ), Deprem ve Jeoloji, TMMOB Jeoloji Mühendisleri Odası Yayınları: 52, s: 91-94.

  • Dumont, J. F. ve Kerey, E., 1975. Eğirdir gölü güneyinin temel jeolojik etüdü .TJK. Bült., 18/2 169-174,

  • Dumont, J. F., Uysal, Ş., Şimşek, Ş., Karamanderesi, I. H., and Leteouzey, J., 1979. Formations of the grabens in Southwestern Anatolia. Bull. Min. Res. Explor. Inst Turkey, 92, 7-18.

  • Ertunç, A., Karagüzel, R., Yağmurlu, F., Türker, E. ve Keskin, N., 2001. Burdur Belediyesi kent merkezi ve yakın çevresinin depremselliği ve yerleşime uygunluk açısından incelenmesi, Sonuç Raporu,SDÜAR-GE.

  • Gutnıc, M., 1977. Geologiquie du Taurus Pisidien au Nord d`Isparta(Turguie). Tru. Lab., Geol.Hist.Univ., Paris.XI, p:112.

  • Gutnıc, M., Monod, O, Poisson, A. et Dumont, J.F., 1979. Géologie des Taurides occidentales (Turquie). Mémoire de la Société Géologique de France, 58, 137, 1-112, 2 cartesHT.

  • Graciansky, PC de. 1972. Recherches geologiques dans le Taurus Lycien Occidental . These Doctorat d`Etat Universite de Paris-Sud. Orsay-France .

  • Hayward, A. B.,1984. Miocene clastic sedimentation related to emplacementof the Lycian Nappes and Antalya complex. SW Turkey:In the Geological Evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean. Dixon JF, Robertson AHF (eds) Geological Society, London, Special P

  • Karaman, M. E., 1986a. Burdur dolayının genel stratigrafisi. Akd. Üniv. Isp. Müh. Fak. Derg., 2, s: 23-35.

  • Karaman, M. E., 1986b. Burdur İli çevresindeki yerleşim alanlarının depremselliği, Müh. Jeolojisi Türk Milli Komitesi Bült. No. 8., 23-30.

  • Karaman, M. E., 1990. Isparta güneyinin temel jeolojik özellikleri. TJK. Bült., 33, s: 57-67.

  • Koçyiğit, A., 1983. Hoyran gölü (Isparta büklümü) dolayının tektoniği. TJK. Bült., 26/1, 1-10,

  • Koçyiğit, A., 1984a. Tectono-stratigraphic characteristics of Hoyran Lake Region (Isparta bend), in: Tekeli, O. and Göncüoğlu, M. C., (eds.) Geology of the Taurus Belt: Proc. Int. Symposium, p: 53-67.

  • Koçyiğit, A., 1984b. Intra-plate neotectonic development in Southwestern Turkey and adjacent areas. Bull. Geol. Soc. Turkey, 27, 1-16.

  • Koçyiğit, A., 2000. Güneybatı Türkiye`nin d e p r e m s e l l i ğ i : B a t ı Anadolu`nun depremselliği sempozyumu (BAD SEM- 2000), Bildiriler, s: 30-38. İzmirValiliği.

  • Marcoux, J.,1987. Histoire et topologie de la Neo- Tethys, These de Doctorat Detat. L`Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris,569p.

  • McClusky, S., Balassanian, S., Barka, A., Demir, C., Ergintav, S., Georgiev, I., Gurkan, O., Hamburger, M., Hurst, K., Kahle, H., Kastens, K., Kekelidze, G., King, R., Kotzev, V., Lenk, O., Mahmoud, S., Mishin, A., Nadariya, M., Ouzounis, A., Paradis

  • McKenzıe, D. P., 1978. Active tectonics of the Alpine-Himalayan Belt: The Aegean sea and its surronding regions, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 55, 217-254,

  • Monod, O., 1977. Recherches geologiques dans de la Taurus occidental au sud de Beyşehir (Turquie). These, Univ. Paris Sud Orsay. 442p.

  • Özgül, N., 1976. Torosların bazı temel jeoloji özellikleri. Bull. Geol. Soc.Turkey, 19, 65-78.

  • Poisson,A., 1977. Recherches geologiques dans les Taurides occidental (Turguie): These, Univ. Paris. Sud, Orsay, p:795.

  • Poisson, A., Akay, E., Dumont, J. F. and Uysal, S., 1984. Isparta Angle (W Taurids): A Mesozoic paleorift. In “Geology of theTaurus belt”, eds. O. Tekeli and C. Göncüoğlu, sp. Pub. MTA. Ankara, 11-26

  • Poisson, A., Yağmurlu, F., Bozcu, M. and Şentürk, M., 2003. New insights on the tectonic setting and evolution around the apex of the Isparta Angle(SWTurkey): Geol. J. 38: 257-282

  • Price, S. & Scott, B., 1991. Pliocene Burdur basin, SW Turkey: tectonics, seismicity and sedimentation. Journal of the Geological Society, London, 148, 345-354.

  • Ricou, L., Marcoux, J. and Poisson, A. 1979. L`allochtonie des Bey Dağları orientaux. Reconstruction palinspastique des Taurides occidentales. Bull. Soc. Geol. France, XXI, 125-133

  • Robertson,A. H. F, andWoodcock, N. H. 1984. The SW segment of the Antalya Complex Turkey as a Mesozoic-Tertiary Tethyan, continental margin: In the “Geological Evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean”. Dixon JF, Robertson AHF (eds) Geological Society,

  • Robertson, A. H. F., Poisson, A. and Akıncı, Ö. 2003. Developments in research concerning Mesozoic-Tertiary Tethys and neotectonics in the Isparta Angle, SW Turkey. Geological Journal, v.38, p.195-234.

  • Sintubin, M., Muchez, P. H., Paulissen, E., and Waelkens, M., 2001. Neotectonics in the territory of the ancient city of Sagalassos (Burdur, SW Turkey): 4 th International Symposium on Eastern Mediterranean Geology,Abstracts, p. 32.

  • Şenel, M. 1984. Discussion of the Antalya nappes. In Geology of Taurus belt (eds. by O.Tekeli, M.C. Göncüoğlu), Proceedings, 41- 51

  • Şenel, M., Bilgin, A. Z., Dalkılıç, H., Gedik, I., Korucu, M., Uğuz, M. F., Serdaroğlu, M. 1991. Eğirdir-Sütçüler-Yenişarbademli arasının ve yakın dolayının jeolojisi (Batı Toroslar): TPAORap. No:3963,

  • Şenel, M., Gedik, I., Dalkılıç, H., Serdaroğlu, M., Bilgin, A.Z., Uğuz, M. F., Bölükbaşı, A. S., Korucu, M. ve Özgül, N. 1996. Isparta Büklümü doğusunda, otokton ve allokton birimlerin stratigrafisi (Batı Toroslar): MTA. Derg., 118, s:111-160.

  • Şengör, A. M. C., ve Yılmaz, Y., 1981. Tethyan evolution of Turkey: a plate tectonic approach: Tectonophysics, 75, 181-241.

  • Şentürk, M., 2003. Acıgöl ve Burdur Gölleri arasındaki bölgenin sismotektonik özellikleri, (Y. Lisans Tezi), S. Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Ens. 82 s.

  • Taymaz, T., and Price, S. P., 1992. The 12.05.1971 Burdur earthquake sequence: A synthesis seismological and geological observations. Geophys. J. Int., 108, 589-603.

  • Temiz., H., Poisson, A., Andrieux, J., and Barka, A., 1997. Kinematics of the Plio-Quaternary Burdur-Dinar cross fault system in SW Anatolia (Turkey). Annales Tectonica, v.XI, n. 1-2, 1o2-113.

  • Yağmurlu, F., 2000. Burdur fayının sismotektonik özellikleri: Batı Anadolu`nun depremselliği sempozyumu, Bildiriler, s.143-152, İzmir.

  • Yağmurlu, F., Bozcu, M., Şentürk, M., 2005. Burdur-Fethiye arasındaki bölgede Burdur fayının sismotektonik özellikleri:TübitakÇAYDAG, Proje No:101Y027, 79 s., (Yayınlanmamış Rapor).

  • Yılmaz, Y., 2000. Ege bölgesinin aktif tektoniği; B a t ı A n a d o l u ` n u n D e p r e m s e l l i ğ i Sempozyumu, Bildiriler, s 3-15.



  • Bozcu, M , Yağmurlu, F , Şentürk, M . (2007). Fethiye-Burdur Fay Zonunun Bazı Neotektonik ve Paleosismolojik Özellikleri, GB-Türkiye . Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi , 31 (1) , 25-48 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jmd/issue/52387/6863

  • Bozcu, M , Yağmurlu, F , Şentürk, M . Fethiye-Burdur Fay Zonunun Bazı Neotektonik ve Paleosismolojik Özellikleri, GB-Türkiye. Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi 31 (2007 ): 25-48

  • The Effect of Geomechanical Properties of Ignimbrites on Their Usage as Building Stone: Nevşehir Stone
    Mustafa Korkanç
    View as PDF

    ABSTRACT: For this study; different colored pyroclastics belong to Kavak ignimbrite that widely spreadsaround Nevşehir were choosen. These rocks were widely used as building stone in low storeyedbuildings and especially in historical building in the past. Nowadays, they have an increasing usagein outer surface covering of the buildings, stairs, floorings, banisters, pools and their surroundings,arches, columns, fireplaces, balcony decorations and restoration applications because of havingdecorative properties. Sampling was carried out in 6 different areas in the field because they havedifferent color and texture characteristics that change frequently in close areas. At firstpetrographical and chemical properties of these samples were determined and then standard rockmechanic experiments were carried out in order to determine their geomechanical properties.According to the results, it is exposed that investigated pyroclastics are non-welded ignimbrite andthere are important relationships between their geological, chemical, petrographical properties andgeomechanical properties. Especially, the samples having opaque minerals, fine grained rockfragments and higher matrix ratio than grain ratio, have lower porosity and higher density andcompressive strength.

  • Ignimbrite

  • geomechanical properties

  • petrographical properties

  • building stone

  • Aydan, Ö., Ulusay, R., Yüzer, E., 1999. Man-made structures in Cappadocia, Turkey and their implications in rock mechanics and rock engineering.ISRMNews Journal, 6 (1), 63-73.

  • Aydan, Ö., Ulusay, R., 2003. Geotechnical and geoenvironmental characteristics of manmade underground structures in Cappadocia. Turkey. Engineering Geology, 69, 245-272.

  • Aydan, Ö., Tano, H., Watanabe, H., Ulusay, R., Tuncay, E., 2007a. Kapadokya bölgesinde antik ve güncel kaya yapılarının kaya mekaniği açısından değerlendirilmesi. Kapadokya Yöresinin Jeolojisi Sempozyumu, 17-20 Ekim 2007 Niğde, Bildiriler Kitabı, 1-

  • Aydan, Ö., Tano, H., Ulusay, R., Kumsar, H., Yenipınar, H., 2007b. Derinkuyu yeraltı şehrinin uzun süreli yapısal duraylılığı ve çevre koşullarının incelenmesi üzerine deneysel bir çalışma. Kapadokya Yöresinin Jeolojisi Sempozyumu, 17-20 Ekim 2007 Ni

  • Beekman, P.H., 1966. The Pliocene and Quaternary volcanism in the Hasandağ-Melendizdağ region.MTABull.,Vol. 66, 99-106.

  • Besang, C., Eckhardt, F, J., Harre,W., Kreuzer, H., Müller, P. , 1977. Radiometriche Altersbestimmungen an Neogenen Eruptivgesteinen der Türkei. Geol.Jb. B 25, 3- 36.

  • Deere, D.U., Miller, R.P., 1966. Engineering classification and index properties for intact rock. Technical Report No. AFWL-TR-65- 116, Air Force Weapons Lab., Kirtland Air force Base, 308 pp.

  • Ercan, T., Tokel, S., Can, B., Fişekçi, A., Fujitani, T., Notsu, K., Selvi,Y., Ölmez, M., Matsuda, J. I., Ul, T., Yıldırım, T., Akbaşlı A., 1990. Hasandağ-Karacadağ (Orta Anadolu), dolaylarındaki Senozoyik yaşlı volkanizmanın kökeni ve evrimi. Jeomor

  • Ercan, T., Tokel, S., Matsuda, J., Ul, T., Notsu, K., Fujitani, T., 1992. New geochemical isotopic and radiometric data of the Quaternary volcanism of Hasandağı-Karacadağ (Central Anatolia).TJK Bülteni, 7, 8-21.

  • Erdoğan, M., 1986. Nevşehir-Ürgüp yöresi tüflerinin malzeme jeolojisi açısından araştırılması. İ.T.Ü. Maden Fak., DoktoraTezi, 100 s (yayımlanmamış).

  • Erguvanlı, K., 1975. Mühendislik Jeolojisi. İTÜ Gümüşsuyu Matbaası, İstanbul, 590 s.

  • Franklin, J. A., Chandra, R., 1972. The slake durability test. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sc. 9, 325–341

  • Goodman, R. E., 1989. Introduction to Rock Mechanics. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, NewYork, 562 pp.

  • Gökçeoğlu, C., Ulusay, R., Sönmez, H., 2000. Factors affecting the durability of selected weak and clay-bearing rocks from Turkey, with particular emphasis on the influence of the number of drying and wetting cycles. Engineerıng Geology 57 (3-4), 215

  • Güleç, N., Toprak, V., Arcasoy, A., 1997. Evaluation of Melendiz Volcanic Complex using remote sensing and geographic information systems. ODTU-AFP: 97-03-09- 02, 84 s.

  • Innocenti, F., Mazzuoli, G., Pasquare, F., Radicati Di Brozolo, F., Villari, L., 1975. The Neogene calcalkaline volcanism of Central Anatolia; geochronological data on Kayseri-Niğde area. Geol. Mag. 112 (4), 349-360.

  • ISRM (International Society for Rock Mechanics), 1981. Rock characterization, testing and monitoring. ISRM Suggested methods. E.T. Brown (ed.), Pergamon Press, 211 pp.

  • Le Pennec, J.L., Bourdier, J.L., Froger, Temel, A., Camus, G., Gourgaud, A., 1994. Neogene ignimbrites of the Nevsehir plateau (Central Turkey): stratigraphy, distribution and source constraints. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 63, 59–87.

  • Le Pennec J.L, Temel, A., Froger, J.L., Sen, S., Gourgaud, A., Bourdier, J.L., 2005. Stratigraphy and age of the Cappadocia ignimbrites, Turkey: reconciling field c o n s t r a i n t s w i t h p a l e o n t o l o g i c , radiochronologic, geochemical

  • Maharaj, R. J., 2001. Assessment of volcanic rock for constrction in the Federated States of Micronsia. Proceedings of the Aggregate 2001-Environment and Economy, 6-10August 2001, (P. Kuula-Vaisaen and R.Uusinoka, editors), Helsinki, Finland, vol. 1,

  • Mcnally, G.H., 1998. Soil and rock construction materials. E and FN Spon, Firts published, London andNewYork, 403 pp.

  • NBG (Norwegian Group for Rock Mechanics), 1985. Engineering Geology and Rock Engineering. HandbookNo2, 249 pp.

  • Pasquare, G., 1966. Outtlines of the Neogene and Quaternary volcanism of Asia Minor. Accad. Naz. Dei Linc., 40, 1077-1085.

  • Pasquare, G., 1968. Geology of Cenozoic volcanic area of Central Anatolia. Memorie: Roma, Academia Nazionale Dei Lincei, 55-204.

  • Pasquare, G., Poli, S.,Vezzoli, L., Zanchi, A., 1988. Continental arc volcanism and tectonic setting in Central Anatolia, Turkey. Tectonophysics 146, 217–230.

  • Postacıoğlu, B., 1987. Beton, Bağlayıcı Maddeler, Agregalar, Beton. Cilt 1-2, Teknik Kitaplar Yayınevi, İstanbul, 404 s.

  • Schumacher, U. M., Schumacher, R., 1996. Problems in stratigraphic correlation and new K–Ar data for ignimbrites from Cappadocia, Central Turkey. International Geology Review 38, 737–746.

  • Temel, A., Gündogdu, M.N., Gourgaud, A., Le Pennec, J.L., 1998. Ignimbrites of Cappadocia (Central Anatolia, Turkey): petrology and geochemistry. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 85, 447–471.

  • Topal, T., 1995. Formation and deterioration of fairy chimneys of the Kavak tuff in Ürgüp- Göreme area (Nevşehir-Turkey). PhD Thesis, METU,Ankara, 250 p (Unpublished).

  • Topal, T. and Doyuran, V., 1997. Engineering geological properties and durability assessment of the Cappadocian tuff. Engineering Geology, 47, 175-187.

  • Toprak, V., Göncüoğlu, M. C., 1993. Tectonic control on the development of the Neogene Quaternary Central Anatolian volcanic province, Turkey. Geological Journal, 28, 357- 369.

  • Türkecan, A., Akçay,A. E., Satır, M., Dönmez, M., Ercan, T., 2003. Melendiz Dağları (Niğde) volkanizması. 56. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurultayı, Bildiri Özleri Kitabı, 16-17.

  • Ulusay, R., Akagi, T., Ito, T., Seiki, T., Yüzer, E., Aydan, Ö., 1999. Long term mechanical characteristics of Cappadocia tuff. Proceedings of the 9 ISRM International Congress, G.Vouille and P. Berest (eds.), Paris, France,A.A. Balkema, 687-690.

  • Ulusay, R., Gökçeoğlu, C., Topal, T., Sönmez, H., Tuncay, E., Ergüler, Z.A., Kaşmer, Ö., 2006. Assessment of environmental and engineering geological problems for the possible re-use of an abandoned rock-hewn settlement in Urgüp (Cappadocia), Turkey.

  • Ulusay, R., Aydan, Ö., 2007. Kapadokya bölgesinde bazı yeraltı açıklıklarındaki tüflerin kaya mühendisliği açısından değerlendirilmesi. Kapadokya Yöresinin Jeolojisi Sempozyumu, 17-20 Ekim 2007 Niğde, Bildiriler Kitabı, 13-23

  • Viereck, G.L., Lepetit, P., Ganskow, G., Gürel A., 2006. The volcanic stratigraphy of Cappadocia, Central Anatolia. EGU General Assembly 2006,Vienna, Geophysical research AbrsractsVol. 8, 10301.



  • Korkanç, M . (2007). İgnimbiritlerin Jeomekanik Özelliklerinin Yapı Taşı Olarak Kullanımına Etkisi: Nevşehir Taşı . Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi , 31 (1) , 49-60 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jmd/issue/52387/686304

  • Korkanç, M . İgnimbiritlerin Jeomekanik Özelliklerinin Yapı Taşı Olarak Kullanımına Etkisi: Nevşehir Taşı. Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi 31 (2007 ): 49-60

  • ISSUE FULL FİLE
    View as PDF