Jeoloji Münendisliği Dergisi
Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi

Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi

1980 OCAK Cilt 4 Sayı 1
COVER
View as PDF
COPYRİHT PAGE
View as PDF
CONTENTS
View as PDF
TO OUR READERS
View as PDF
Haluk Sipahi Orhan Baltan Bilge Yavuz Aktaş Aydin Balta Şahap Melek Kabri Esentürk Sefer Burhanettin Coşkun
View as PDF
  • Grandwater

  • Agricultural Fields

  • Water Tunnels

  • Drilling Methods

  • Some new data southern Menderes massif and structurai interpretation
    Mustafa Attila Çağlayan Esat Melih Öztürk Zübeyde Öztürk Mehmet Umur Akat
    View as PDF

    ABSTRACT: The basement rocks of the Menderes massif, often referred to as `the core` consist mainly of augen-gneiss, granitic geniss and migmatites. An obscured unconformity exist between the core- and the overlying cover consisting of two sequences.., The first, metamorphic sequence at the base consist of garnetif erous-schist, muscovite^quartzite, chlorite- chloritoid schist, calc-schist and phllite. Another obscured, unconformity seperates this sequences from the overlying slightly metamorphic sequence which starts with basal quartzconglomerates grading upward to phylliles, dolomite, crystalline limestone, red limestone, turbiditic sandstone and greywackes with exotic blocks. The age of 4Jie cover rocks ranges from Devonian to Paleocene. The rock unite Possibly belonging to the Taurus orogenic belt are correlated with the cover rocks of the Menderes massif and their lateral, continuation is defended, The rocks consisting

  • Menderes Massif

  • Metamorphic Succession

  • Taurus Belt

  • Stratigraphy

  • Tavas-Milas(Denizli-Muğla)

  • BAŞARIR, E,, 1970.. Bafa gölü doğusunda kalan Men- * deres masifi güney kanadının jeolojisi ve petrografisi, Ege Univ.. Fen, Fak. fimi raporlar serisi 102. Jeoloji 8

  • GRACİANSKY P. De. 1.965. Menderes masifi güney kıyısı boyunca (Türkiye`nin GB`sı) görülen, metamorfîzma hakkında açıklamalar M.T.A. derg. 64. 8-12. —` .., 1968. Teke yarımadası (Lrfkya) Toroslannm üst üste gelmiş ünitelerinin, stratigrafisi ve Binaro Teraslardaki, yeri,. M... T. A. derg,, 71. 39-92,.

  • ÖZGÜL JSL,, 1976. Toroslarm. bazı temel jeoloji özellikleri. TJK Mltenî. 19, sayı. 1. 65-78

  • ŞENGÜN M.,, 1978, Alanya masifinin yapısal sorunu. •Jeoloji Mühendisliği. 6. 39-44

  • SCOUILJJNG R, D,, 1962, Ttirkiyenin güneybatısındaki Menderes migmatit kompleksinin petrolojisi ve yapısı hakkında. M. T. A., derg.. 58. 7. -84

  • Sadik Açan Erdal Genöz Hikmet Tümer
    View as PDF
  • Energy Bottleneck

  • Lignite

  • Thermal Power Plant

  • Thrace Region

  • A critical review of the age of emplacement of ophioRtes
    Metin Zengin
    View as PDF

    ABSTRACT: This article aims to discuss and criticise questions evolving from the age of emplacement and, processes through which ophiolitie melanges are formed. The following points seem, relevant in respect to existing controversies. 1. The nature of the process of melange formation, has not yet `been clearly understood. Sedimentary roeks-that have been deposited after` the emplacement of ophiolites` may have been tectonized resulting in block formation. Thus ages obtained from blocks will indicate .an earlier age of emplacement of`"ophiolites. *` 2. Ophiolites cannot yield pebbles to the shallow shelf deposits during the process of obduction. Thus detritics containing ophiolitie pebbles must be underlain (or be adjacent to ophiolitie outcrops on the continent side) by ophiolitie rocks. 3. The term. "Ophiolitie melange" is used as a genetic term despite its undoubtable descriptive nature, Melanges may not necessarily consist of roks belonging to the same tectonic environment. An ophillitie melange may contain volcanic rocks of continental. . characte as- well as sedimentary rocks deposited after the emplacement. Mapping of such tectonic units result in fatal mistakes in interpretations leading to geotectonic models. 4, `Working `hypotheses particularly the closure of a Mesosoic oceahic crust during late Cretaceous results in unnoticing critical and important contradictions., It may be concluded that ophiolite emplacement is Pre^Mesosoic in age and possibly much earlier.

  • Ophiolite Settlement

  • Tectonic Environment

  • Volcanism

  • Sediment Rocks

  • AJcdeniz, N., Konak,, N., 1979, Simav-Emet-TavşanlıIXirsunbey-Demirci yörelerinin jeolojisi, MTA.. Ra-- ponı (Yayınlanmamış).

  • Akyflrek, B., Bijginer, EEL, Çatal» E., Dager, Z., Sosyal. Y.» Sunu, O., 1079, Eldivan-Şabanozü (Canlan) dolayında ofiyolit yeıieşmeaine ilişkin bulgular,. (ÏMO dergisi» yayınlanmak üzere)`.,

  • Brunn, J. H.» Argyiadis, I., Marcoux, J.f Monod, -O., Poisson,, A..» Ricov, L., 1.073`» Antalya .Haplarının orijinal lehinde ve: aleyhinde kanıtlar,, 50, yıl Yer bilimcileri Kongresi S. 58. 59

  • I. Oehadijömk Güngör Unay
    View as PDF
  • Sempor Dam

  • Loading Slip Experiments

  • Rock Slip Experiment

  • Cohesion

  • B&şjamtş formation
    Necati Akdeniz
    View as PDF

    ABSTRACT: Başlamış formation cropping` out in the vicinity of Başlamış- village,, west of Menderes massive, overlies the ophiolitic complex with. an. angular uneonformity.- It consist, from base to top, of a conglomerate consisting mainly of opMolite pebbeles and is transitionally followed by sandtones, marls and limestones. Herdian, Cuisian and Lutetian fossils have been found in this formation. It is conformably overlain by a sequence- consisting1 of an .alternation of red coloured conglomerates and sandstones of probably Oligocène age. These .are iinconfor- ^ mably overlain by conglomerates and volcanics of probably Miocene age,.

  • Menderes Massive

  • Başlamış Formation

  • Ophiolitic

  • Discordance

  • Akdeniz, N. ve Konak, N., 1070» Simav Emet-TavşanlıDtırsunbey-Demirci yörelerinin jeolojisi: MTA. Derleme Rap. no-: 6547 (yayınlanmamış).

  • Arpat,. B.f Norman» T., 1961» Akhisar 70/é paftasının batı yansının, kapsadığı sahalarda jeolojik incelemeler; MTA Derleme `Rap. No. 3458

  • Bingöl» E., 1976, Batı, Anadolunun Jeotektonik evrimi: MTA Dergisi, 86, 14-35.,

  • Bingöl» E!.,» 1977, Muratdağı jeolojisi ve anakayaç birimlerinin, petrolojisi: TJK Bülteni, .20, 2, 13-67,,

  • Canet, J.., Jaoul, P.. r 1946, Manisa-Ay dın-Kula-Görcles bölgesi, jeolojisi ha.kkin.da rapor 1 : MTA Derleme, Rap, no. ,2068

  • Canik, B. :r 196:2, îyiOOOOO ölçekli Akhisar 70/1 paftasının doğu kısmı ile Akhisar 70/2 paftasının jeolojik revizyonu hakkında, rapor ; MTA. Derleme, Rap. no 34.65

  • Dubertret, L, ve Kalafatçıoglu, A., 1973, 1/500 000 ölçekli Türkiye: jeoloji haritası izahnamesi (tzmir paftası) : MTA. yayını

  • Nebert, K., I960,, Tavşanlı`nın batı ve kuzeyindeki linyit ihtiva, eden. Neojen sahasının mukayeseli stratigrafisi: MTA Dergf 54, 7-35-,.

  • Oğuz Arda
    View as PDF

    ABSTRACT: The Technology and the Metallic-ore Departments of the Mineral. .Research, and Exploration Institute (MTA) investigated the heavy mineral concentrates- of the gold-bearing upper, gray coloured conglomerates which occur in, the Izmir, Salihli-Sart area,, The following heavy minerals as well as gold, and gold-amalgemetes have been identified under` the microscope within these concentrates. a) .Sulfides: Pyrite, Marcasite, Chalcopyriie, Cinnabar, Sphalerite,», Pyrrhotite, Tennantite- ltetrahedrite, Arsenopyrite, Galena, Barnite* Covellite, Realgar,. b) Oxides: Magnetite+Ümeno-Magnetite» Rutile+Anatase, Hematite+ÎIineno-Heinatite, tlmenite^,, Chromite, Spinel» Pyrolusite., c) Phosphates Apatite« The dectron micropro`be studies of gold grains» which show various tones of colour under . the microscope, indicate that besides gold they contain, such metals as silver, bismuth, mercury, thulium.» iridium, copper, germanium, osmium and iron. Gold usually occurs as an amalgamate with these elements. The results of semi-quantitative o;ptic spectrographic .analyses indicate `the presence of tin, in `the range of 300-700 ppm., in. the heavy mineral concentrates of the Salihli-Sart cong- , lomerates., Various fractions of these heavy mineral, concentrates, which, are enriched, in their rutile contents» have been .analysed and studied under the microscope,., Tre results of the semi-quantitative analyses show that tin, is. closely related `with the titanium content `Of rutiles. `Therefore it is- concluded that tin. is emplaced within the crystal structure of rutiles.

  • Gold

  • Manisa Salihli-Sart

  • Conglomerates

  • Heavy Minerals

  • Alpan, `T., (1977), Saîilıli-Sart altın aramaları,, M.T.A., Enstitüsü raporu, yayınlanmamış

  • Çağatay, A., ve Eytiboğlu, T., (1977), Batı. Anadoludaki bazı antîmonit, arsenopirit, zinober, şeelit yatak ve zuhurlarının jeolojik-mîneralojik in.ce- -lemeleri ve elde edilen jenetik bulgular. (Yayında) .

  • Besborugh», G.A.,,, 1970),. Silver depletion, indicated by microanaiysis of .gold from placer occurences,. Western United States, Econ, Geol, vol. 65, pp. 304-311

  • Ensmetali, XV., (19§2), Metalloinetrische Kartlerun- .geii, nach, den Zerstreuungsauralen in, gebirgigen Lexuïschaften, Stuttgart, S. .206

  • Hawkesr, H. E, ve Blum, H. (1057), Heavy metals ili stream sediment used as exploration guides `Transactions, American. Institute. of Mining, Metallurgical and Pertrolemn Einglneeds (AI MB),, vol 205, New York,, pp

  • Noäop, G., )19( 5G), Beitrag zur Kenntnis FOB. Anatas, Rutil und Zinnstein,. Festschrifft Hermann... Rose .Berlin (Bonıtraeğer), s, 239-284

  • Raiîtüoh P.(I960), Die Erzmineralien und ibre Ver wactoswngenr 3 Aufl., Berlin

  • Stamptfl. ELF. and Clark, A.WL, (1965), Electron-probe microanalysis of gold-platinoid concentrates from southeast. Bomeow-Transact,, Institution, of ICiiiiiigf and Metallurgy,, vol.. 74,, Ijondon

  • Taş» Ş., (1977), Yarıkantitatif optik-ftpektrografl ana Mas raporu.. Kap. No. 77/298, Sip. No. 7, Kod,:: 4c» Ub . No, 4700&4701Ş, M. T. A. :Lafo. Dairesi.

  • Yıldız. M.C., (1977), Altın, Yeryuvarı vé İnsan. Cait » »«3^: & 17-25 .Ankara

  • Zimmerte, W..,, (1973), Fossil heavy mineral concentra,-tions... Geologiscbe Rundschau, Band €2, Heft. 2 a 536-548» Stuttgart.

  • Geology -and economic possibilities of Karadere, NW Tosya
    Bekir Haluk Ayaroğlu
    View as PDF

    ABSTRACT: The surveyed area is situated on the northeastern flank of the Ugaz Mountain, 42` km southeast of Kastamonu.* Palaozoic, Mesozoie and Tertiary .formations are represented in. the area. The Palaeozoic formations lie at the basement of the Ilgaz Mountain and are composed of micaceous epidote and chlorite schists formed during the epimethamorphie phase. They occur as sericite schist and graphite schist in .places.. In, addition, •there are .large Hocks of recrystallized nodular limestones within schists. The Mesozok formations are dominated `by the Upper Cretaceous limestones which were deposited in the neritic .zone and developed during the limestone- phase* these limestones contain, fossils of Maestrichtien age- Tertiary formations are represented by micro and cryptocrystâüine limestones with an abundant fossil content; exposures of sandstone, conglomerate and basalt are also found in. places.. Based on the fossil content» these `units, .are determined as Paleogene. The Alpine orbgenic phases effected the area, and consequently, folds.», faults and joints were formed.. As for mineralization, there are some promising areas for nickel» Nickel content reaches •0,27 `% in these locations. Apart from it there are two separate chromite and one -asbestos oeeurences in the area.

  • Karadere NW Tosya

  • Geology

  • Economic Possibilities

  • Limenstone

  • Vol, a, Liverpool and .Manchester GeoL X, 2, 503

  • Hills» Ew &t Elements of Structural Geology, .239 (Mèthuen and C, Ltd., London, 1963).

  • Willis, B., Ü.S,., GeoL Surv. Thirteenth Anix Rep 2» 211 (1893).

  • Kienow, &, N. Jb. GeoL u. Pal, Mh.,.,, 39 (Stuttgart,1951)

  • Patersem, M. &. äne `Weiss, L„ EU Nature, If5, 1046 (1962).

  • Kniil, J. U, Proc. GeoL .Assoc., 7:2» 13 (1901).Ramsay, J. G., GeoL Mag.» 9§» Ö10 (1962)

  • Anderson, E, M., The Dynamics of Faulting- (Oll ver and Body, Edinburgh and London,, 1942) Hubbert, M. ICf GeoL Soc. Amer,. Bull.» §2, 355-1951

  • Becker, G., F., GeoL. Soc. Amer. Bull, 4, 13 (1893).

  • Dr.t.b. Anderson Meliha Yurdakul
    View as PDF
  • Kınk-Bandlar

  • Geological Structures

  • Morphological

  • Deformation

  • Vol, a, Liverpool and .Manchester GeoL X, 2, 503

  • Hills» Ew &t Elements of Structural Geology, .239 (Mèthuen and C, Ltd., London, 1963).

  • Willis, B., Ü.S,., GeoL Surv. Thirteenth Anix Rep 2» 211 (1893).

  • Kienow, &, N. Jb. GeoL u. Pal, Mh.,.,, 39 (Stuttgart,1951)

  • Patersem, M. &. äne `Weiss, L„ EU Nature, If5, 1046 (1962).

  • Kniil, J. U, Proc. GeoL .Assoc., 7:2» 13 (1901).Ramsay, J. G., GeoL Mag.» 9§» Ö10 (1962)

  • Anderson, E, M., The Dynamics of Faulting- (Oll ver and Body, Edinburgh and London,, 1942) Hubbert, M. ICf GeoL Soc. Amer,. Bull.» §2, 355-1951

  • Becker, G., F., GeoL. Soc. Amer. Bull, 4, 13 (1893).

  • Â. New technique for 8-wave detection in soil mnd significance of this in engineering geology
    Uğur Kuran
    View as PDF
  • S Waves

  • Alluvial Fields

  • Engineering in Geology

  • Ultrasonic Tests

  • Kuran Uğur, 1975 An Experimental Investigations of `Cyclic strees-strain relation, and fatigue: crack propagation in .rocks,. Ph. D. (Doktora tezi- ` Imperial Colloge-London)

  • Kuran Uğur, 1975 Yer altı suyundan maksimum verim elde edilecek sahanın jeofizik çalışmalarla saptanması ve `bunların mühendislik problemlerin çözümündeki önemi

  • Sakal Yäsika, 1968 - Sakal konik penetrometre- •:;. ;• ,`sitizerine bir konferans, imar`ve îskan Bakanlığı»

  • Kuran. `Uğur, 1977. Anadolu otoyolu, izmit Kent •~ `-• Geçişi ve: izmit Sapanca arasındaki sanat yapılarına ait zeminin deprem parametrelerinin jeofizik yöntemlerle bulunması ile ilgili rapor. T.C,K. Araştırma Fen.Heyeti Mü

  • Kuran. Uğur, 1977 Izmir Kent Geçişi Jeofizik Raporu

  • Kuran. Uğw, 1969 - Sosyal. Sigortalar Genel Müdürlüğünü projelendirecek olan. Ö..D..T.Ü, karşısın, daki sahanın Mühendislik Jeolojisi ve jeofizik raporu

  • Imai, Tsuneo» Masayoshi Yoshimura 1975-The relation, of Mechanical Properties of Soils to P-and S-Wave velocities for Soil Ground in. Japan. OYO Technical Note

  • Kuran. Uğur, Gençoğlu Ahmet, 1975 `Sapanca .geçişi göl içi sismik-refraksiyon ¥e rezîstivite çalışmaları,,, T.G..K. Araştırma Fen Heyeti Md..

  • Kuran Uğur, Yücel Erbaş, 1976. Samsun, havaalanı -heyelan, sahasiyle ilgili Mühendislik Jeolojisi ve Jeofizik ön raporu.

  • Kuran Uğur 1977. Zigana Tüneli içinde ve Heyelan ve sahalarında ek&tensometrelerle elde edilen kuvvet defornıasyon Def ormasyony zaman olayının tanımı. irFtirkiye. Jeofiziktiler Derneği Yayını» CVL S,, 2, 3. S. (5-28)

  • Kuran TJgur 1975-60` Mekanik sondaj kuyusu neticesinin sismik-refraksiyon ve: rezistivite netice-` leriyle korelasyonu. (yayınlanmamış),

  • Tezcan, S. S,, İpek M,, 1774; Shear wave propagation in Layered soils. In. Rep,. No: 74-2E Boğaziçi Üniversitesi

  • Ergünay, Oktay,. 1973-Deprem Araştırma Enstitüsü Bülteni No: 2.

  • Mooney, Hârold M. 1974-Selsmic Shear Waves`ln Engineering;,. ASCE. Vol. 100 PP. 905-923

  • fOCHABT, F. S..197&. Some effects of .Dynamicsoil properties on soil-structure interaction. ASCE Vol: 101

  • Medvedev 5, V. 1963 Quantitative data. on. ground motion from, strong earthquakes in research field of engineering1 seismology,. Federal Sci-Tech, Int. TT-66-62216

  • Medvedev S. V. V.I Bune * Instruction Manual for Micrazößingr (UNBSOp/NS/SBIMS) (ESP-12

  • Kuran,, Uğur 1979; Devirli med-cezir kuvvetleri sonunda arz kabuğu içinde gelişen fatigue - kırık - ilerlemesi ve Kuzey Anadolu San, Andreas fay- - lan, boyunca,

  • View as PDF
    View as PDF
    View as PDF
    View as PDF
    View as PDF
    ISSUE FULL FİLE
    View as PDF