Jeoloji Münendisliği Dergisi
Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi

Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi

1985 NİSAN
COVER
View as PDF
COPYRİHT PAGE
View as PDF
CONTENTS
View as PDF
TO OUR RAEDERS
View as PDF
New data on the Elbistan ensimatic island-arc sediments and age
Niyazi Tarhan
View as PDF

ABSTRACT:  A volcanosedimentary sequence around Afşin-EIbistan, which consiste of (rock stratigraphie units including) spîMMc basait, basaltic andésite, andésite, aglomerate, tuf fite (dacite-rhyodaciteurhyolite), alkalime rhyolite (alkalin© liparite) and deep marine pelagic sediments (radiolarite, chert, limesfom© ani tor« biditic sandstone) overlying the Gökscm metaophiolite. These volcanosedimentary units which aï© presented as the Elbistan mslnıatic islmnâ-arc sequemc©,, exMMte trace» of regional, contact and cUslocafcioa (retrograde metamorphism) mtainorphism. This sequence lias been interprettei as the product of an ensiaıatic isîamd-arc eropteâ under deep marine conditions over the oceaa crust during Upper Tri assicJurassic ag© ocean crust (Göhsun metaophiolite) Neocomian (Valanginian) times.

  • Elbistan

  • Ensimatic İsland Arc

  • Sedimentary Findings

  • Age

  • Âkkoca, A,., B. ve Bahçeci, A., 1972, Beritdağı ve yöresindeki demir1 prospeksiyonunun Jeolojik rapora.: Maden Tetkik ve Arama; Enst. Derleme Rap, No. Ö001, Ankara (yayınlanmamış).

  • Atasever. t, 1978, K. Maraş-EIMstan-Çardaîc-Meıı^iiMiHavcılar demir zuhurları raporu: Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enst,,, Derleme Rap. No. 6833, Ankara (yayinlaäanamis)»

  • Bingöl, AJF,, 1983, Geology of `the Elazığ area in. the Eastern, Taurus region.: Geology of the Taurus belt, p„ 2O0U216, Turkey,..

  • Bryan, W.B. ve Diğerleri, 1972, Geology, petrology, and geochemistry of the volcanic islands of TongaJour. Geophys. Res., 77, 1565-1585.

  • BAuraeathal, M:,, lW»f V. Tares rapora., Seylan, antitorosiijo.ua Jeolojik bünyesi üzerine ilk talaş: Maden tetkik ve Arama Bnst. Derleme Rap, No. 841, Ankara Cyayınlanımajııış),.

  • Friedman, G.1C, Barzel, A. and Derin., B,.,, lifi, Pa. leoen¥ironments of1 the Jurassic inde coastal belt of Northern and central Israel : Geol, S^ıırv,, Isr., Rep,,, OD/I/fl.

  • Goldberg, M. aiKi^ Friedman, GM.t 3^974, .Baleoenvinsiments `and paleogeogphic evoliiuon of the Jurassic ısystenı in -Southhem Israel: `Geol. Surv. Bull., No. 61, 44p

  • Gäkalp, B#| 1972, ElbMan-Oela içmeleri jeoloji-niâroloji etüdü raporu: Maden Tetkik, ve Arama Genel Mudi. Derleme Rap. No-.. 5827, Ankara (yayınlanmamış) .

  • Hatay, N., 1966, K,.. MaraşjGöksun-SIbfstan bölgesi dias-. porit prospeksiyoııu rapora: Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müd. Derleme Bap. No,. 3:852, Ankara (yayınlanmamış)

  • Hempton, NÄ ve Savcı, G., 1982, Elazığ` volkanik karmaşığının petrolojik ve yapısal özellikleri; Türkiye leol, Kurumu Bült, 25/2, 143-15İ0.

  • Meissner, F.F., Cyclic sedimentation in. Middle Permian strate of the Permian `basin, West Texas and. New Mexico In: 2nd., pp., 203-232, West Texas: Geol. Society Midland Texas.,

  • MyasMro, A,, 1072, I«eviia tektoniğinde metamorfizma^ ve toununla İlgili .mağınatizma: Am, Jour., of Science, v. 272, p. €02,, `— 1074, Volcanic rock: series in Island arcs .and active continental margins: Am,, Jour, Sei, 274,, 321.355p.. `— 1075, Isdan-arc volcanic aeries a. ciital review: Petrologie, 3.» CT-187p.

  • Moor, J.G., 1071, Kelatk>näüp between subsidence and volcanic; Load Hawaii ; Bull. Volcano!,,, v. êf p. 520-576.

  • Kami, B.f 1971, .Affln.M.tiz Mlg^esinm Ou-FbuZn azamalan, ile ilgili jeoloji raporu : itetMlc ve Amma Genel Mttd. Derleme Rap. No., 4880, Ankara (yayınlanmamış).

  • Pampal,, S., 1988, Doğu Torbalarda Kadirli-Kozan-Feke (Adana) ile Çökak (K. Mara§) arasmdaki `bölgenm stratigrafisi ve tektonik dzelikleri : Selçuk Üniv. Müh. Fak. Dr. tezi

  • Perinçek, D., 1978,, Researching` petroleum ;possiMlites •and geological stud, of Çelikhan-Sincik-Koçali (Adıyaman) region : Ph.. D. thesis, TJP.A.O., report 1250 (unpublished)

  • Perinçek, D. ve Kozlu, H., 1983, Stratigraphy •and structural relation of the units in the Afşin,-Eltolstan-Döğanşehir region (Eastern. Taurus} : Geology of the taorus toeltj 181-198 p, Ttokey.,

  • Polat, M.K.,, 1970, K. Mara^-Göksun ilçesi `bakır sahasının, jeolojik, ön etüdü : Maden Tetkik ve Aa~ rama Genel Müd. Derleme Rap. No,, 4581, Ankara (yayınlanmamış).,

  • Şengör, A.M.C. ve Yılmaz Y., `Tirkiye^e Tetis`in evrimi; levha tektoniği açısından bir` yaklaşım ; Türkiye Jeol. Kurumu., Yerbilimleri özel dizisi, No. 1, Ankara.

  • Tarhan, N.,,, W8âf Göksün-A£şüuElbistan dolayımın jeolojisi : Jeoloji Mühendisliği Dergisi, 19, 3-9.

  • Yazgan, E., and. Asutay, J. 19&1,, Definition ofstruetural units located-, between Arabian platform, and. Munzur Mountain» ana, their significance in the geodynamic evolution of the area : 35 th Congress of the Geolical Socity of Turkey, Abstracts, 44-45.,

  • Yazgan, B., Michard, A., Whitechurcli, H. and Montigny, B., 1983, Le< Taurus de Malatya. (Turquie orientale), étaient de la suture sud-tethysienne : Bull. Soc. Geolg. France,, No, 1, 59-69.

  • Evidence for Ernst-West shortening to north of Ispmrtm angle
    Aydoğan Boray Fuat Şaroğlu Ömer Emre
    View as PDF

    ABSTRACT: Geological studies on, the Neogene and `Quaternary deposits in the Şuhut-Çay area Yalva$- Geletndort area and Saltandîağ; area situated to the nortlbof of tii© İsparta angle indicate that the Neotectonic regto© is compressioııal. The Neogene deposits in this region are terrestrial, iluvfatile and lacustrine^ and overlie üneonfornıably the pre-NctDgene rocks.. Although Ia.tear.al and `vertical transitions are common in, these, deposits. Urn sequence is from to top: conglomerate, marlylimestone to the Şuhut-Çay area, conglomarafe- saııdsloııesiltetoııe ,iBarI-iîiariyllıııest`Oiı.e-,liııı.esıtone in the aYIvaç-Gelendost -area and limestone-conglomerate in th.© Sıdtan-dağ area. The tectonic structures in the Neogene depositis are iuïds and. reverse faults wMch ftrwally trend N-S, and soin.©, normal faults which trend1 E-W, The latters are observed in a small part to the Şnhut-Çay area. The Neogene deposits near1 the contacts with underlying basement are «more deformed and hav© greater dips than, the roles- far from the con tact. All these data indicate that since the Upper-Miocene this region is affected: by a compression. There is n»t any evidence for a large scale tension»! reglmg. It Is assumed thai the structure» developed under this conmressional regime cans© the; closing of the Xsparta_&ngle which Itself was a resistance to the westward movement of the Anatolian plato in `the neotoctonie period.,

  • Isparta Bend

  • East-West Contraction

  • Kuaterner Sediments

  • Limestone

  • Akbulut, Am$ 1980, Eğridir gölü. güneyinde Çandır (Sütçüler, İsparta) yöresindeki batı Tbroslaraı jeolojisi; Türkiye Jeol. Kur. Bült. 23, l-§,

  • Malay,, î., 1075, Tektonik: hareketlerin Sultandağlarının Jeomorfolojisine olan etkiler1 : Türkiye Jeol. Kur. Bült, 18, 21-26.

  • Becker-Platen J#D., Benda, I* ve Steffens,, P., 1977, Litho-und biostratîgraphische Deutung radiometrisclıer Altersbestimmungen aus dem Jungtertiär der `Türkei: Geol, Jb. B 25, 139-167.

  • Benda, L., 1971, Grundzüge einer1 pollenanalyfcisciien Gliederung des TurMscIien Jungtertiärs: Bein. Geol. Jb. 113. 46 s

  • Blumenthal, M..M,,, 1963 Le Systeme structural de Tauras .sud. Anatolien: lâwre a la mem. prof, P. Fallût: Mem., hs-ser, Soc. Geol, France, 11, €11-662

  • Brunn, JJH., 1976, L`arc concave ziagro-taurique et leasarcs convexes taurique et egeen: collision et induits: Bull,, soc. geol, France, (7) XVIH, No 2f 568-567.

  • Delaune Mayere, M., Marcoux, J., P.arrot, J-F et Fois- .son. À., 1977, Modele d`évolution Mesozoique de la paleO`-merge tethysienne au niveau des nappes radiolari.ti.ques et ophiolltiques du. Taurus Lycien, d rAntalya et du Baer-Ba-sstt; Biju-Diwal, B ve Montadert, .1*... éd. .Structural history`of Mediterranean Basin: Editions Technip; Paris, 70-94.

  • Demirkol, C, Sipahi, H„ ve ÇigeJc, S., 1.977, Sultandagının stratigrafisi ve^ jeoloji evrimi: Yayınlanmamış MT!A Raporu, Derleme. Nk> 6805,,,

  • Dumotıt, J..F,, ve Kerey, B., 1975, Batı Toroslar ile Köprüçay Baseni sınırında Kuzey-gfiney doğrultu atımlı. fay; `TuAiye Jeol, Kur., B01t.f 18, 50-62.

  • Dumont, J..F., 1979, Le. déformations tectonique superposées postérieures aux nappes crétacées dans la coupole: de Karacahisar au. Nord-Est l`angle d`Lsparta (Taurîdes occidentales,, Turquie) ; C.R somm. Soc. geol,, France 3, 136-139.

  • Erişen, B., 1072, Afyon-Heybeli (KizilMlise) jeotermal araştırma, .sahasının jeolojisi, ve jeotermal enerji olanakları: yayınlanmamış MTA. Rapora, Derleme No 3107.

  • Erol, O.f 1981, Neotectonic and geomorphogieal evulation of Turkey; .Zeitschrift für Geomorphlogie: N„F, Sııppi. Bd.., 4% 193-211.

  • Kogyiğit^ A,., 1981^ İsparta büklümünde (Batı Toraklar) Toros Karbonat platformunun evrimi,: Tffrkiye Jeol,, Kur.. BOlt., 24/2, 15-23,

  • Koçyiğit, A..,, 1983, Hoyran gölü (İsparta bükUüntt) dolayınm tektoniği:: Türkiye Jeol. Kür. Bült., 26, 2êf 1-10.

  • MJcKenzie, D.P., 1972, Active Tectonics of the Mediterranean, region: Jour., Roy. Astron, soc., 30t 109-185.

  • Özgül, N., 1976, Toroslarin. bazı temel jeolojik, özel- `likleri; Türkiye Jeol. Kur. Bült,, 10, 65-78,

  • Öztıirk,, B..M., öztürk, Z.,, Acar, Ş., Ayaroglu, A., 1981, .Şarkikaraağaç Hsparta) dolaymın jeolojisi: Yayınlanmamış MTA raporu, Derleme No 7045.

  • Poisson,, A.,,, 1977 Recherches géologiques dans les Taurides occidentales (Turquie) ; Hies© de Etat,, Uni¥, Paris-Sud Orsay, 795 p,

  • garoğlu, F., Boray, A,, özer, S. ve Kuşçu, Î., 1983, Orta Tbroslar-Oîrta Anadolunun güneyinin Neotektoniği île ilgili görüşler: Jeo;morf. Bergisl.,, 11, 35-43

  • gengöry A,.M...OL, 1980, TQrïuye`iUa Neotektoniğinln Bsaslam Türkiye Jeol. Kor,,, Konferanslar dizisi, 2, 40 B

  • Şengör, A..M.C. ¥e^ Yılmaz,, Y., 1981, Tethyan evolution of Turkey: A., Plate Tectonic approach Tectonop`hysics,, 75, 181-24-1

  • Waldron, J.W.F., (baatada), Evolution, of Carbonate platforms on a margin of the Tethy» ocean: İsparta angle, SW Turkey, Eclogae geol,,, Helv,.

  • Petrogenesis amd origin of green schists in the Äkäag Massif (Simaw - Kütahya)
    Bektaş Uz
    View as PDF

    ABSTRACT: Study area cavers the total Âfedaë and also partially Ala$am massives. There are four different; rock types in tin© region, namely; metamorpMcs, various granits, volcanucs and volcano-sediment Neogene foimaAtans, `The irotanftorphios originated by the metemurpMsm of the phylHtic charaeteiizei series, such silicates and limestones, Lower section of the metamorplılc series which is ealled to to merozonal has a p0lym«temorpW.c proper-` ties, TMs section also shows sow» Uthologie amâ pétrographie différencies with respect to the monometaniorpMc and epteonal level* In the ©plzomal upper series, the g^reensMst» has an cyclic stratifications with calcstist and metBmorphic limestones. Relating to the oiigines, there comies out an interesömg and a special conditions, M tiiese oyles ar© stadîaed geologically, petarograplıicaîy and g:eo€ hemically. Pefcrog^apMc and clemical properties indicate that tlie greeesMsts lave ortho (or magmaÄc) origin©, In ottier words, it is t ie product of the metamorphlsms of the sediments contetotag a«ific ani basio la¥as which has stünated thicloıess of 4#0 to 600 meters

  • Akdağg Massif(Simav-Kütahya)

  • Green Schists

  • Petrogenesis Examination

  • Volcano Sedimentary

  • Guitard, G,f 1965, De métamorphisme progressif imésozonal et les .gneiss oeiués du CANIGOU (Pyrénées. Orientales): Pétrologie et structure Théa pyroxene et des. .roches a Wérnerîte - Paris se Paris. 523 s.

  • Lacroix, A,., 18S9f Comtsibatîon a `L`étude des gneiss 1889: Bull, Söc. Fr. de Min,. Tom XII, 83-364.

  • Moin©, B. ve De la Roche, H.., 1968, Nouvelle approche du probleme d-e I«`origine de» amphibolites a par-, tir de leur Composition, chimique: C.R. Acad, Seien, Paris: Ii=:2ê7 Série D. 39-42.

  • Moine, B., 1971, Caractères de Sedimentation et, de métamorphisme de» Séries Précamteiennes épi- .zonales,, Catazonales du. Centre d© Madagascar: Thèse d`Otat, Nancy-Tom. I et II.

  • De la Roche H.., 196$, Comportement geockimkLue `différentiel de Na, K, et Ai `dans* les formations Volcaniques et sédimentaires; •un .guide pour L`étude des formations métamorphique» et platoniques-: 0.R. Âcad. Se. Paris t: .267 Serie D,, 30-42

  • Uz, B., 1978`.,, Les formations métamorphiques et granitiques du massif ancien d`AKDA.0 {StmavTurquie) et leur couverture volcano-sedimantaire : thèse d`Etat Nancy., Tbm. I et H, 308 s,

  • Uz, B.., 1975, AKDAĞ (SJmav) metamorfik serîlerin jeokimyasal evrimi ve polimetamorfizına: T.B.T. A.K.. V. Bil,. Kong. 1075, 29-1-308

  • Uz,, B.tf Sındırgı-AMıisar toölgesi öfiyolit MrMpniB: Petrografik-Petrojenetik ve jeokimyasal incelenmesi: Doçentlik tezi, İ.T.Ü. Maden, Fakültesi,, 821 s

  • Uz, Bmy 1979, Orto ve Para anıfibolit sorunu AMağ masifi amfibolitlerinin kökeni: Zonguldak Müh. Mim.. Akad. Dergisi, 3, 43-47.

  • Weisbrod, A., 1970» Pétrologie du Bode metamo.rpM.qme` des cevennes médianes` (Massif1 Oentral Français) : Nancy, Fac. Se. Thèse d`Etat, vol,. 4,,

  • Discussion on the parent problem of gneisses und amphibolites im the IÀce-Kulp (Diyarbakır) and Çökeky&zî-Gökay areas of the Bitlis massif
    Salim Genç
    View as PDF

    ABSTRACT: Mıe lice-Kıılp area lies on the southern, whilst the Çökekyazı-Gökay district is situated dose to the norttam margin d the Bitlis massif. In both districts, there are lithologioal units pertaînîngf to the rock groups of the Bitlis massif called lower ami nppe associations. Among1 these units metequartelte marble, micascMsfc, gneiss and amphibolites are the most {widespread. The gneisses and ampbibolites are only emeoiimierecl in the lower, whilst the others are observed in the bith associations. The metaquartzite, marble and oıica-scMsts have been derived from sedimentary parents; certain gneisses tana ampMbolites are the derivatives of sedimeııtary, whereas the others come from igneous origin The gneisses, some of which, exiMt a- well developed scMstosity are locally found iıı alternation with the metaqpartzltes ani merbles while sonne others pass laterally in to the mica-schists» This situation indicates that some of the gneisses are of sedimentary (pelitic rocks) origin. The others of the gneisses, on the other hand, show a relatively massive structure and are observed as bodies cutting locally the other metamorpMes. This implies that these gneisses may be of igneous ( acidic igneous) origin In places, the amphibolïtes are seen In alternation with quartzmieeschists and are locally encountered as massive bodies cutting the mleanschists. These evidences show that some of the aimphifeolites have been resulted from the metamorphism of sedimentary rocks» that is Impure limestones or marls, and the others have been derived from the metamorphism of basic Igneous roeks. This interpretation concerning with the origin of the amphibolites< is also- supported by Bb/Sr ratio values obtained `via XKF analyses, and microsooplo studies.

  • Bitlis massif Lice-Kulp(Diyarbakır)

  • Çökeky&zî-Gökay(Hizan-Bitlis)

  • Gneisses

  • Amphibolites Sediment

  • Boray, A., 1973 The structure and metamorphism of the Bitlis area, SE Turkey: Londra Üniversitesi 233 s, doktora tezi (yayınlanmamıştır).

  • Boray, A., 1975, Bitlis dolayının yapısı ve ınetamorfizmasi: Türkiye Jeoi. Kur. Bült,, 18, 81-84.

  • Ça.ğu,tay? N., 1982, .Pancarlı (Bitlis) nikel-bakır sülfid cevherleşmesinin jeoloji, mineraloji ve^ jeokimyası: Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fak..,, Jeoloji Müh.. Bölümü doçentlik tezi (yayınlanmamış) , Ankara.

  • Erdoğan, B., Dora, O.Ö., 1983, Bitlis masifi apatîtli demir yataklarının jeolojisi ve oluğumu: Türkiye Jeol. Kur. Bült., 26, 133-144.

  • Hlvans B.W., Leake, B.E;., I960, iTh,e^ composition and origin of the striped amphibolites of Oonnemara, Ireland: J. Petrol., 1, 337-363.

  • Genç, S.,, 1.97Î, Geological evolution of the southern margin, of the Bitlis massif, Lice-Kulp district, .SE; Turkey: Wales Üniversitesi,. .281 s, doktora tezi (yayınlanmamış), Aherystwyth, İngiltere,,,

  • Genç, S., 1981, Bitlis masifi güneyindeki metamorfitlerde polifaz metamorfîzma (Mce^-Kulp yöresi, Diyarbakır) : Karadeniz: Üniversitesi Yer Bil. Der., Jeoloji, tf .20-39.

  • Göneüoğlu, M.C., Turhan,, N..,, 1083, Bitlis metamorfitlerinde yeni ya§ bulguları;: MTA, D`erg,,, 9-5/96:J, 44-48.

  • Hail, R. r 1.974, The. structure and petrology of an ophiolitic mélangenear Mutki, Bitlis province, iTor.. key: Londra Üniversitesi, doktora tezi (yayınlanmamış).

  • Hatch, F.H., Wells, MM^ 1961, Petrology of the Igneous rocks, 515 &, Thomas Murfoy and Co,,, I*on~ dra

  • Helvacı, C., 1983, Bitlis masifi Avnik (Bingöl) bölgesi metamorflk kayalarının, petrojenezi : Türkiye Jeol. Kur. Bült.,, 28, 117-132.

  • Hyndnran, D.W., 1972, Petrology of igneous and metamorphic rocks, 533 s,, McGraw Hill,, New York

  • Leake, B.3B„ 1964, The chemical distinction between ortho-and para-ampMbolifes : J. Petrol.,, 5, 238- 256,

  • Miyashiro, A., 1973, Métamorphism and metamoiphic belts: 4:02 s, George Allen and Un:win Ltd,, Londra

  • Spry, A.., 1974, Metamorphic textures: 350 s, Fergamoi Press, Oxford.

  • Turner,. F.J., 1968, Metamorphic petrology, mineralo. gical and field, aspects: 403 s». McGraw HUI, New York

  • Winkler, H.G-.F., 1976, Petrogenesis of metfiiaorphic ` rocks: 334: s, Springer-Verlag, New York,..

  • Whitten, D.G.A., Brook®, J.R.V., 1976, A dictionary of geology: Penguin Books, HazeU Watson and VU ney Ltd.., Aylesbury, ingiltere

  • Yılmaz,, On 19-71» Étude pêtrograpMque et gêochrono- - nologique de .la région de Cacas: Grenoble Üniversitesi,, 230 s, doktora tezi (yayınlanmış) Grenoble. Fransa.,

  • Yılmaz, O., 1975, Cacas `bölgesi. (Bitlis masifi) koyaçîarının petrografik ve stratigrafik İncelenmesi: Türkiye Jeol., Kor,., Btili, 18, 33-40,.,

  • View as PDF
    View as PDF
    View as PDF
    View as PDF
    View as PDF
    View as PDF
    View as PDF
    View as PDF
    ISSUE FULL FİLE
    View as PDF